Basketball Free For All

Players earn their fantasy value in different ways. Some players provide well-rounded stat lines that are more or less without weakness. Other players’ fantasy value is derived from strengths in a few categories or even just one category. The flip side is that some players can hurt a fantasy team with large negative values in one or more categories. These large negative values often occur in the efficiency categories (shooting percentages and turnovers).

Over the past few years, no other player has embodied the spirit of the Cat Carrier and the Cat Killer than Orlando’s own superhero, Dwight Howard. D12 is a Cat Carrier for three categories; rebounds, blocks and field goal percentage. At the same time, Howard is also a Cat Killer in two categories; free throw percentage and turnovers.

When constructing a winning Roto or Head-to-Head team, it is important to build a cohesive team while finding value throughout the draft. In H2H it is much easier to overcome weaknesses than it is in a Roto league, thus allowing for managers to take on Cat Killers without completely destroying their team’s chance of success. In Roto leagues, the Cat Killers are much harder to handle.

But in determining which Cat Carriers to draft or which Cat Killers to avoid, it is important to have a method of comparing Carriers or Killers in different categories to each other. Enter player valuation systems such as Basketball Monster or Ziguana.

Player valuation systems commonly rely on Z-Scores to allow us to compare apples (counting statistics, such as blocks) to oranges (efficiency statistics, such as field goal percentage). Since all counting statistics are on different scales, they also allow us to compare one type of apple (rebounds) to another type of apple (threes). Z-Scores do this generally by using standard deviations to rank all players against the average of a particular category. These individual Z-Scores are aggregated to assign an overall value for each player.

In trying to predict future fantasy production, past production is one of the biggest factors that comes in to play. As with most statistics, the more data you have the more reliable your conclusions. Thus, by using multiple years of data, you can better control for suspensions, injuries, down seasons and other outliers.

What follows is a list of the largest Cat Carriers and Cat Killers based on cumulative values over the past three seasons based on Basketball Monster’s Player Rankings in the nine standard categories. To eliminate any fringe players, a minimum of fifty games played was enacted. I relied on BBM’s valuations over Ziguana’s because BBM has a simple filter to limit the data to the past three seasons. Three seasons of data was used to help control for anomalies while also allowing some of the younger players to make the list.

And now, the rankings.

*Table is sortable. Click on column headers to sort data.

Over the course of the last three seasons, the single largest positive contributor to any one category has been Marcus Camby in blocks (averaged 3.1 blocks over the past three seasons). The next three top dogs were a trio of elite point guards in Steve Nash (10.8 assists), Chris Paul (10.2 assists) and Deron Williams (10.1 assists). Rounding out the top five is Amare Stoudemire with his highly efficient scoring from the field (.572 percent shooting on 14.1 attempts per game) due in part to Nash’s aforementioned dimes.

In simply perusing the top five players on this list, it becomes apparent why punting assists is so popular in H2H leagues. If you miss a top shelf point guard in the draft, you will have trouble competing against the managers that get one of the assist Cat Carriers. If you broaden the scope to the top ten players, Jason Kidd makes an appearance at seventh overall for assists as well (9.3 assists).

If you re-sort the data to put the values in ascending order, Dwight Howard takes the top spot, also know as the best of the worst. Howard’s free throw percentage (.590 percent on 9.9 attempts per game) is the single biggest category contributor in fantasy basketball over the past three seasons, period. Unfortunately for Howard and his Roto owners, this contribution is negative. In a close second is Shaquille O’Neal’s free throw percentage impact (.524 percent shooting on 6.5 attempts per game).

To reiterate, these two values are by far the biggest single category contributions in fantasy basketball, whether positive or negative. Either of these two negative free throw percentage contributions dwarfs Camby’s positive value in blocks in comparison. For rookie managers, the lesson should now be crystal clear. When dealing with percentages, attempts matter. A lot. That is why Andris Biedrins‘ free throw percentage (.565 percent shooting on only 2.6 attempts per game) is not nearly as damaging as Howard’s or Shaq’s. It still hurts a team, but is much more managebale than Howard’s.

Another lesson that managers of all experience levels can learn from examining Cat Carriers and Cat Killers is that Cat Carriers that are not also Cat Killers are always in high demand. These players are much easier to move than Cat Carriers that are also Cat Killers. For Roto leagues, and to a lesser degree H2H teams, Cat Killers are difficult to incorporate into a team after the draft because teams need to have a specific means of moderating the impact of a Cat Killer. Thus, targeting Cat Carriers can give you lots of trade value because these players can almost singlehandedly make a team competitive in a certain category. Oftentimes, managers are looking to trade for players that help deficiencies and not players that provide solid across the board value.

By looking at these values and comparing them against each other, it is apparent why winning a Roto league with Dwight Howard is such a difficult task that few have accomplished in competitive fantasy leagues. Moreso than any other player in the league, Howard was built for H2H play and should only be drafted in Roto leagues by managers who have a clear-cut plan in place of reducing the harm caused by Superman’s free throw shooting and the chutzpah to take the plunge.

With little NBA news to report on these days other than Tuesday’’s release of the upcoming 2009-10 schedule, it’s time to take a look at the best remaining free agent point guard out there, Raymond Felton. With all due respect to Allen Iverson, Jason Williams and less respect to Jamaal Tinsley, Felton is the best point guard available without a long term deal.

After being selected fifth overall by Charlotte in the 2005 draft, Felton has played his entire career in a Bobcats uniform and is now looking to secure his future with the franchise. The problem is that the big-wigs in Charlotte don’t seem to be in a rush to lock up his services for the long term.

Felton was the first point guard taken in the draft after Chris Paul and Deron Williams, respectively, and has done a good job of running the point for the past four seasons for a young Bobcats team. While averaging just over 35 minutes per game, Felton has provided respectable but not jaw-dropping production for his team. His career averages are: 13.6 points on 39.9/78.5 percent shooting, 6.7 assists, 3.4 rebounds, 1.4 steals and 0.2 blocks and 2.7 turnovers.

The most glaring deficiency in his game is the 2.8 turnovers he averaged per game in ‘08-’09, putting him at 15th overall in that category. He also is a poor shooter going just under 40% from the field and a lowly 28% beyond the arc last year. On the bright side, he is a durable player who has missed only nine games in four seasons.

So why is Felton getting the cold shoulder from his club?

The Bobcats have publicly stated that one of their off-season priorities is to sign him to a long term extension. Failure to do so would mean Felton would become an unrestricted free agent in the summer of 2010, which could also be called the summer of LeBron James. The highly touted free agent class of 2010 will be loaded with many All Stars who are all seeking maximum deals during a period of impending salary cap reduction. Which means GMs will be less willing to spend the big bucks on free agents when facing a dollar-for-dollar penalty for every dollar spent over the luxury tax threshold.

After a meeting last month with Charlotte GM Rod Higgins, Felton’s agent Kevin Bradbury walked away a little disgruntled saying:

“We’re definitely not close as far as what we’re discussing and what we think fair market [value] is for Raymond… At this point I’m not as encouraged as I was a day ago or even a week ago, but that doesn’t mean that it can’t get done.”

Source: CBS Sports

Both sides appear to be interested in hammering out a long term deal for Felton. The sticking point is how much should a player like Felton should command. While Felton cannot be considered a top tier talent at the point guard position like his draft mates Paul and Williams, he is a reliable young guard with the ability to run a team for many years to come. His agent believes he should command more that just the mid-level exception ($5.58M in ‘08-’09) but how much more?

It will be interesting to see what type of contract a player of his value is worth in today’s troubled economy. It would be in Felton’s best interest to get an extension done now versus trying to hit the big payoff next summer amid a barrage of talent and not enough money to go around.

What will those crazy Bobcats and Hall of Fame Coach Larry “trade ‘em all” Brown do next?

They are a hard team to figure out. The team is currently up for sale and recently traded the franchise’s supposed cornerstone and first draft pick in franchise history, Emeka Okafor, to New Orleans for Tyson Chandler and his bum toe. It would be surprising but not shocking if the Cats decided not to tender an offer to Felton and allowed him to play out his remaining contract and enter unrestricted free agency.

If Felton walked, they would be forced to turn over the keys to the driver’s seat to second year guard D.J. Augustin. That would seem like a huge gamble to let your starting point guard walk and place all of the burden on young Augustin, but hey, this is the Bobcats we are talking about here (a.k.a the New Memphis).

Utah Jazz All-Star power forward Carlos Boozer has until the end of June to decide if he will opt out of his current contract that is slated to pay him $12.7 million in 2009-10. During the season, Boozer publicly stated that he planned to test free agency. Boozer is looking to make more money in a lagging economy, which features more teams with smaller payrolls and less cap room.

In addition, Boozer may enter free agency after coming off an injury-laden season in which he missed 45 games. A season that also saw him play the fewest games in his career, record the lowest field goal percentage, and the lowest scoring average since 2005-06. Boozer struggled throughout the season and seemed hampered by the knee injury that required arthroscopic surgery in January.

On Monday he told ESPN’s Jim Rome that he would:

Do my homework, do my due diligence and on June 30, I’ll decide either to opt in or opt out.

Source: Desert News

This sounds like a man who is not so sure of himself anymore. Walking away from nearly $13 million might not sound like the best idea. Boozer is playing on a team that had been steadily progressing for the past few seasons… until their first round flame-out this year at the hands of the Lakers. He is playing in a system that allows him to maximize his somewhat limited offensive repertoire. He also has a top point guard in Deron Williams giving him the easiest buckets of his life right at the rim.

So is it really best for Boozer to opt out?

Over the last few seasons Boozer has established himself as a quality power forward that can put up 20 and 10 every night. A number of teams, including the Pistons, Heat and Raptors, have all been rumored to have varying degrees of interest in Boozer. He has the ability to give you an instant post presence and is a decent defender (although he could definitely improve in this department). He also brings a veteran presence and playoff experience to any locker room. It’s no surprise there are a number of suitors for his services despite the down economy.

A young team like the Bucks could be a great fit for a player like Boozer. With Charlie Villanueva potentially leaving, Boozer could pair with Andrew Bogut in the front court and make for a potent punch. All of this of course depends on Boozer’s willingness to accept being the number one option on a glamor-less team. Contrast that with being the number two option in a contending program (sorry Boozer, Deron is the star).

So how would Boozer’s fantasy value be affected by a change in scenery?

Boozer’s best fantasy days are behind him. I don’t see his stats getting any better no matter which team he joins. Boozer’s production in Utah is a direct correlation to his relationship on the court with Deron Williams. Williams’ ability to run the pick and roll with Boozer allows him easy looks near the basket consistently. In Utah he is the number one scoring option, so becoming a number one option on another team does not necessarily mean his field goal percentage or scoring average will increase.

Boozer is a number one option with Utah but he has other capable scorers on the court with him: Williams, Mehmet Okur, Kyle Korver, and Andrei Kirilenko to name a few. These players allow Boozer to mostly remain double-team free by stretching out the defense. If Boozer is the sole scoring option on a mediocre team, his field goal percentage would tumble and turnovers would rise with more attention by the opposing defenses constantly doubling him. His recent health issues only make you wonder whether or not his body can withstand playing heavy minutes and taking a beating in the post. I wouldn’t want to waste one of my top picks hoping he is up to the challenge.