Strategy: Cutting Turnovers
Like in real life, one of the most important aspects of managing a team successfully involves making adjustments. Often, a few minor tweaks can make the difference in transforming a middle-of-the-road team into a juggernaut. One of the easiest ways to strengthen a fantasy squad is by building upon your strengths in head-to-head or by shoring up your weaknesses in roto without adding turnovers. Even more useful is to add to your strengths or to shore up your weaknesses while at the same time reducing your turnovers.

Turnovers are an easy category to win consistently based on the simple observation that most managers, including very competent and competitive managers, don’t pay much attention to turnovers. They play in nine category fantasy leagues but basically value their players based upon only eight categories. They take the attitude of letting the chips fall where they may in both roto and head-to-head leagues despite the fact that it is very much in their interest to keep the turnover numbers down.
Probably the most common argument against using turnovers as a scoring category in fantasy leagues is that people feel that the best players in the league are penalized because they have the ball in their hands so much when trying to create for their team. It is definitely a valid argument but there is something to be said for looking at the assist-to-turnover ratio instead of the raw turnovers. But that’s another argument for another day. For now, we are stuck with standard nine category fantasy basketball, for better or worse.
If you find yourself competing in a league that counts turnovers, trading a few of the players that hurt you on turnovers (such as Monta Ellis or Chris Kaman) for a few players that take care of the ball and address other needs can pay dividends. It is important to point out that there are players of all caliber that have manageable turnovers, including first round talents on down the line, so the previously mentioned argument that states good players are needlessly punished for turnovers doesn’t hold water. There are excellent players that average less than two turnovers per game while providing you with solid fantasy value, despite playing over 35 minutes per night. These players are just more rare and in higher demand than their bumbling counterparts.
The following chart contains players who are a net gain for your fantasy squad in terms of turnovers. It contains players of all positions and of all calibers, but is restricted to the players within the top 100 in per game value for the entire season. These valuable players are guys that make for interesting trade targets for managers trying to keep their turnovers to a minimum.
*Table is sortable. Click on column headers to sort data.
| Rank | Name | To/G | ToV |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Martin, Kevin | 1.4 | 0.61 |
| 3 | Nowitzki, Dirk | 1.7 | 0.25 |
| 11 | Camby, Marcus | 1.1 | 1.01 |
| 12 | Williams, Louis | 1.8 | 0.11 |
| 18 | Nene | 1.5 | 0.45 |
| 21 | Horford, Al | 1.2 | 0.84 |
| 25 | Murphy, Troy | 1.5 | 0.48 |
| 31 | Gallinari, Danilo | 1.3 | 0.73 |
| 32 | Garnett, Kevin | 1.6 | 0.37 |
| 36 | Frye, Channing | 0.9 | 1.22 |
| 38 | Richardson, Jason | 1.0 | 1.07 |
| 39 | Landry, Carl | 1.5 | 0.43 |
| 40 | Lewis, Rashard | 1.4 | 0.66 |
| 41 | Deng, Luol | 1.7 | 0.23 |
| 42 | Dunleavy, Mike | 1.1 | 0.98 |
| 43 | Oden, Greg | 1.9 | 0.02 |
| 44 | Love, Kevin | 1.9 | 0.02 |
| 45 | Carter, Vince | 1.5 | 0.48 |
| 47 | Jamison, Antawn | 1.6 | 0.33 |
| 48 | Morrow, Anthony | 1.5 | 0.48 |
| 51 | Bargnani, Andrea | 1.5 | 0.48 |
| 54 | Allen, Ray | 1.7 | 0.27 |
| 58 | Green, Jeff | 1.7 | 0.17 |
| 59 | Aldridge, LaMarcus | 1.0 | 1.12 |
| 61 | Udrih, Beno | 1.7 | 0.21 |
| 63 | Villanueva, Charlie | 1.3 | 0.79 |
| 64 | Kirilenko, Andrei | 1.4 | 0.62 |
| 65 | Haywood, Brendan | 1.4 | 0.60 |
| 66 | Terry, Jason | 1.7 | 0.25 |
| 67 | Miller, Mike | 1.6 | 0.41 |
| 68 | Jefferson, Al | 1.7 | 0.28 |
| 69 | Dampier, Erick | 1.4 | 0.67 |
| 70 | Azubuike, Kelenna | 0.8 | 1.41 |
| 71 | Hamilton, Richard | 1.3 | 0.69 |
| 73 | Watson, CJ | 0.8 | 1.34 |
| 75 | Bell, Raja | 0.8 | 1.34 |
| 76 | Andersen, Chris | 0.7 | 1.50 |
| 80 | Speights, Marreese | 1.3 | 0.74 |
| 82 | Marion, Shawn | 1.1 | 0.95 |
| 83 | Ridnour, Luke | 1.3 | 0.77 |
| 84 | Crawford, Jamal | 1.6 | 0.34 |
| 85 | Lee, Courtney | 0.9 | 1.26 |
| 89 | Salmons, John | 1.5 | 0.45 |
| 90 | Calderon, Jose | 1.6 | 0.34 |
| 91 | Thompson, Jason | 1.9 | 0.01 |
| 93 | Wallace, Ben | 0.9 | 1.23 |
| 95 | West, David | 1.7 | 0.17 |
| 96 | Beasley, Michael | 1.7 | 0.28 |
| 98 | Okafor, Emeka | 1.5 | 0.45 |
| 99 | Blatche, Andray | 1.3 | 0.77 |
| 100 | Ilyasova, Ersan | 1.2 | 0.83 |
Right off the bat, one of the top two players in per game value is extremely impressive but should not be surprising. Dirk Nowitzki is constantly underrated and yet consistently provides amazing cumulative value from season to season. Over the past three seasons, only Chris Paul and Kobe Bryant have provided better cumulative value. And yet Dirk gets passed over for guys that bring in sexier stat-lines ever year but are either less efficient or more injury-prone. Dirk is a great first round pick for a head-to-head team that is looking to either punt assists completely or to just keep turnovers low.
In Kevin Martin’s case, the 1.4 turnovers per game were really impressive for two related reasons. First, K-Mart played big minutes (41.8 minutes per game) during the five games he appeared in earlier this season prior to his wrist injury. Just being on the floor for over forty minutes a night and not turning the rock more over is pretty impressive by itself. Even more impressive is the low turnovers coupled with his very high usage rate (29.4 usage percent while on the floor; this usage percent puts him in the top ten in the league this season). If he could only stay healthy, Kevin would rank among the league’s elite in fantasy leagues that count turnovers.
In perusing further down the list, you start to notice that there is a dearth of point guards that have low turnovers. There are four players that provide more than four assists per game while also keeping the turnovers low. These four players are Jose Calerdon (6.1 assists per game), Lou Williams (5.1 assists per game), Luke Ridnour (4.4 assists per game) and Beno Udrih (4.1 assists per game). Looking these same players from the assist-to-turnover perspective, they are re-ranked as follows: Calderon (3.84), Ridnour (3.43), Williams (2.84) and Udrhi (2.42). Target players such as these four if you are looking to add assists without overburdening turnovers. Contrast their stats with the aforementioned Ellis, who averages 5.0 assists per game but also tallies 4.3 turnovers for an AST/TO ratio of 1.17, which is not great for a guard.
For each statistical need, there are players on the table that provide the production you are looking for. For three point shooting, give Danilo Gallinari (2.8 threes per game) or Channing Frye (2.5 threes per game) a look. For boards, target Nene (8.8 rebounds per game) or Al Horford (9.4 rebounds per game) to clean up the glass. In the end, you can find add to your strengths or reduce your weaknesses while also reducing your team turnovers. It simply requires targeting the right low turnover players for your team.
| in, Kevin | 1.4 | 0.61 | |
| 3 | Nowitzki, Dirk | 1.7 | 0.25 |
| 11 | Camby, Marcus | 1.1 | 1.01 |
| 12 | Williams, Louis | 1.8 | 0.11 |
| 18 | Nene | 1.5 | 0.45 |
| 21 | Horford, Al | 1.2 | 0.84 |
| 25 | Murphy, Troy | 1.5 | 0.48 |
| 31 | Gallinari, Danilo | 1.3 | 0.73 |
| 32 | Garnett, Kevin | 1.6 | 0.37 |
| 36 | Frye, Channing | 0.9 | 1.22 |
| 38 | Richardson, Jason | 1.0 | 1.07 |
| 39 | Landry, Carl | 1.5 | 0.43 |
| 40 | Lewis, Rashard | 1.4 | 0.66 |
| 41 | Deng, Luol | 1.7 | 0.23 |
| 42 | Dunleavy, Mike | 1.1 | 0.98 |
| 43 | Oden, Greg | 1.9 | 0.02 |
| 44 | Love, Kevin | 1.9 | 0.02 |
| 45 | Carter, Vince | 1.5 | 0.48 |
| 47 | Jamison, Antawn | 1.6 | 0.33 |
| 48 | Morrow, Anthony | 1.5 | 0.48 |
| 51 | Bargnani, Andrea | 1.5 | 0.48 |
| 54 | Allen, Ray | 1.7 | 0.27 |
| 58 | Green, Jeff | 1.7 | 0.17 |
| 59 | Aldridge, LaMarcus | 1.0 | 1.12 |
| 61 | Udrih, Beno | 1.7 | 0.21 |
| 63 | Villanueva, Charlie | 1.3 | 0.79 |
| 64 | Kirilenko, Andrei | 1.4 | 0.62 |
| 65 | Haywood, Brendan | 1.4 | 0.60 |
| 66 | Terry, Jason | 1.7 | 0.25 |
| 67 | Miller, Mike | 1.6 | 0.41 |
| 68 | Jefferson, Al | 1.7 | 0.28 |
| 69 | Dampier, Erick | 1.4 | 0.67 |
| 70 | Azubuike, Kelenna | 0.8 | 1.41 |
| 71 | Hamilton, Richard | 1.3 | 0.69 |
| 73 | Watson, CJ | 0.8 | 1.34 |
| 75 | Bell, Raja | 0.8 | 1.34 |
| 76 | Andersen, Chris | 0.7 | 1.50 |
| 80 | Speights, Marreese | 1.3 | 0.74 |
| 82 | Marion, Shawn | 1.1 | 0.95 |
| 83 | Ridnour, Luke | 1.3 | 0.77 |
| 84 | Crawford, Jamal | 1.6 | 0.34 |
| 85 | Lee, Courtney | 0.9 | 1.26 |
| 89 | Salmons, John | 1.5 | 0.45 |
| 90 | Calderon, Jose | 1.6 | 0.34 |
| 91 | Thompson, Jason | 1.9 | 0.01 |
| 93 | Wallace, Ben | 0.9 | 1.23 |
| 95 | West, David | 1.7 | 0.17 |
| 96 | Beasley, Michael | 1.7 | 0.28 |
| 98 | Okafor, Emeka | 1.5 | 0.45 |
| 99 | Blatche, Andray | 1.3 | 0.77 |
| 100 | Ilyasova, Ersan |

